J. G. Merquior
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Max Weber, central thinkers to the discussion of political legitimacy, represent two very different stages and forms of social theory: early modern political philosophy and classical sociology. In these studies, Dr Merquior describes and assesses their individual contributions to the understanding of the concept of political legitimacy.
Dr Merquior compares Rousseau and Weber to a handful of other major theorists and highlights the contemporary prospects of the alternatives between democratic participation and bureaucratizm.
This book was first published in 1980.
Introduction; Part 1 Rousseau´s Political Philosophy; Chapter 1 Rousseau´s Theory of Political Legitimacy: the General will; Chapter 2 The Intellectual Background of the Social Contract; Chapter 3 Conflicting Misinterpretations and Unilateral Assessments; Chapter 4 The Theory of Democratic Legitimacy; Chapter 5 Concluding Remarks: Rousseau the `Anarchaist´; Part 2 Weber´s Sociology of Legitimacy; Chapter 6 An Outline of Weber´s Theory of Legitimacy; Chapter 7 A Brief Assessment of Weber´s Theory of Legitimacy; Chapter 8 Historicism and Sociology;
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Max Weber, central thinkers to the discussion of political legitimacy, represent two very different stages and forms of social theory: early modern political philosophy and classical sociology. In these studies, Dr Merquior describes and assesses their individual contributions to the understanding of the concept of political legitimacy.
This book was first published in 1980.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Max Weber, central thinkers to the discussion of political legitimacy, represent two very different stages and forms of social theory: early modern political philosophy and classical sociology. This book describes and assesses their individual contributions to the understanding of the concept of political legitimacy.
