Über den Autor
Ernesto U. Savona is a Professor of Criminology at Università Cattolica in Milan and Director of TRANSCRIME (Joint Research Centre on Transnational Crime) Università di Trento/ Universita Cattolica. He is also the President of the European Society of Criminology (2003/2004) and Editor of the European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. Savona is an author and editor of many books and articles on changes in crime and their implications for criminal policies. He is the coordinator of many research projects funded by International Organisations and National Governments.
1 Emerging Challenges.- 2 The Fox and the Hunters: How IC Technologies Change the Crime Race.- 3 New Challenges for International Rules against Cyber-Crime.- 4 Combating Cyber-Crime: National Legislation as a Pre-Requisite to International Cooperation.- 5 New Challenges for Law Enforcement.- 6 Threats to the Net: Trends and Law Enforcement Responses.- 7 Privacy and Investigative Needs: Progressing from Incompatible to Complementary Positions.- 8 Technology and Intelligence Collection.- 9 New Challenges for Research: Technology, Criminology and Crime Science.- 10 Research on Crime and Technology.- 11 Crime Mapping and the Training Needs of Law Enforcement.- 12 Some Reflections on Drugs and Crime Research in an International Context.- THE AUTHORS.
Guido Rossi As Chairman of ISPAC, I want to thank all the contributors to this book that originates from the International Conference on Crime and Technology. This could be the end of my presentation if I did not feel uneasy not considering one of the problems I believe to be pivotal in the relationship between crime and technology. I shall also consider that the same relationship exists between terror and globalization, while globalization is stemming from technology and terror from crime. Transnational terrorism is today made possible by the vast array of communication tools. But the paradox is that if globalization facilitates terrorist violence, the fight against this war without borders is potentially disastrous for both economic development and globalization. Antiterrorist measures restrict mobility and financial flows, while new terrorist attacks could lead the way for an antiglobalist reaction. But the global society has yet to agree on a common definition of terrorism or on a common policy against it. The ordinary traditional criminal law is still depending on the sovereignty of national states, while international criminal justice is only a spotty and contested last resort. The fragmented and weak international institutions and underdeveloped civil societies have no power to enforce criminal justice against t- rorism. At the same time, the states that are its targets have no interest in applying the laws of war (the Geneva Conventions) to their fight against terrorists.