Andrew J. Dick (deceased) was Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA. He taught research methods, juvenile delinquency, and social problems among other classes. He also conducted long-term research on the efficacy of peer courts as a tool for rehabilitation, as well as other sociological subjects.
William Rich is Professor Emeritus at California State University, Chico, USA, where he taught graduate courses in Educational Leadership and Curriculum in the School of Education. Additionally, he served as school district consultant in policy re-design based on participative inquiry processes that uncover local cultural biases and organizational barriers to success. He has held positions as private and public school teacher, public school administrator, and university professor.
Tony Waters is Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA, and beginning in 2016, Professor of Peace Studies at Payap University, Chiangmai, Thailand. He has taught Criminology, Social Theory, and Cultural Theory among other subjects. His past writing includes titles in classical social theory, violence, criminology, and refugees. He has published several books on these topics, including Schooling, Childhood, and Bureaucracy (2012), and Weber's Rationalism (2015) as well as Crime and Immigrant Youth (1999), and When Killing is a Crime (2007).
"This book´s most valuable contributions to the field of criminology consist in its deillegalscriptions and discussions of the issues of delivering education programs in this kind of climate as well as the challenges this poses for conducting research. The authors´ vignettes provide uncensored deillegalscriptions of what goes in California´s prisons that go far in explaining what is wrong with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The reader might tend to regard some of these accounts as at least exaggerated, but let me assure you that what they describe is, unfortunately, not in the least unusual.” (Norman Skonovd, Lecturer in the Department of Sociology, California State University, Chico, USA)
"This frank, funny, disturbing, and personal account of attempts to educate state prisoners steals any naïveté we might have had regarding attempts to rehabilitate criminals and integrate them back into society. Those interested in prison education and the interface between complex organizations and evidence-based practice will get an education they never expected. The interspersed vignettes bring us back to reality with a jolt.” (S. David Brazer, Associate Professor and Director of Leadership Degree Programs, Stanford University, USA)
This book explores California´s prison system in the context of vocational education reform. For prisons in the early twenty-first century, ideologies of evidence-based management meant that reform efforts to change the purpose of prisons from punishment to rehabilitation through vocational education required "evidence” to justify policy preillegalscriptions. Yet who determines what constitutes evidence? In political environments, solutions are typically pre-conceived, which means that the nature of the evidence collected is also preconceived. As a result, key assumptions about outcomes are often wished away to show improvement and be accountable. Through a detailed analysis interspersed with stories from the authors´ experiences "behind the wall” among California´s prison population, the authors challenge the nature of evidence-based research as used in the prison environment. In the process they describe the thorny problems facing reformers.
Preface: A Study of Vocational Education in California Prisons
List of Tables
List of Figures
SECTION I
CHAPTER
1 Structure and Thesis of the Book
2 Applied Research in California´s Prisons
3 Prison Logic Meets Educational Research Logic: The Undiscussables of Evidence-Based Decision Making
SECTION II – THE REPORT; VIGNETTES
4 Vignette: Could the Prisoner be My Son?
5 Report: Vocational Education in California Prisons: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Twelve Courses
6 Literature Review
7 Vignette: Sunglasses
8 Vignette: Greenhouses
9 Report: Methods
10 Report: Results and Research Questions
11 Vignette: Shifting Bureaucratic Sands and Work Stoppages
12 Vignette: I´m All Good
13 Report: Discussion
14 Vignette: Educators Only Whisper in a Custody World
15 Recommendations and Conclusion
16 Vignette: Denial of Love; The Birds of Prison
17 Vignette: Life Without Parole & "Could be Worse”
SECTION III
18 Evidence Based Decision Making and the Rise and Fall of Rehabilitation in California´s Prisons 2005-2012
References
This book explores California´s prison system in the context of vocational education reform. For prisons in the early twenty-first century, ideologies of evidence-based management meant that reform efforts to change the purpose of prisons from punishment to rehabilitation through vocational education required "evidence” to justify policy preillegalscriptions. Yet who determines what constitutes evidence? In political environments, solutions are typically pre-conceived, which means that the nature of the evidence collected is also preconceived. As a result, key assumptions about outcomes are often wished away to show improvement and be accountable. Through a detailed analysis interspersed with stories from the authors´ experiences "behind the wall” among California´s prison population, the authors challenge the nature of evidence-based research as used in the prison environment. In the process they describe the thorny problems facing reformers.
This book explores California's prison system in the context of vocational education reform.
This book explores California's prison system in the context of vocational education reform. For prisons in the early twenty-first century, ideologies of evidence-based management meant that reform efforts to change the purpose of prisons from punishment to rehabilitation through vocational education required "evidence" to justify policy preillegalscriptions. Yet who determines what constitutes evidence? In political environments, solutions are typically pre-conceived, which means that the nature of the evidence collected is also preconceived. As a result, key assumptions about outcomes are often wished away to show improvement and be accountable. Through a detailed analysis interspersed with stories from the authors' experiences "behind the wall" among California's prison population, the authors challenge the nature of evidence-based research as used in the prison environment. In the process they describe the thorny problems facing reformers.
Preface: A Study of Vocational Education in California Prisons.- List of Tables.- List of Figures.- SECTION I.- 1. Structure and Thesis of the Book.- 2. Applied Research in California's Prisons.- 3. Prison Logic Meets Educational Research Logic: The Undiscussables of Evidence-Based Decision Making.- SECTION II- The Report.- 4. Vignette: Could the Prisoner be My Son?.- 5. Report: Vocational Education in California Prisons: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Twelve Courses.-6. Literature Review.-7. Vignette: Sunglasses.-8. Vignette: Greenhouses.- 9. Report: Methods.- 10. Report: Results and Research Questions.- 11. Vignette: Shifting Bureaucratic Sands and Work Stoppages.- 12. Vignette: I'm All Good.- 13. Report: Discussion.- 14. Vignette: Educators Only Whisper in a Custody World.- 15. Recommendations and Conclusion.- 16. Vignette: Denial of Love and The Birds of Prison.- 17. Life Without Parole and "Could be Worse".- SECTION III.- 18. Evidence Based Decision Making and the Rise and Fall of Rehabilitation in California's Prisons 2005-2012.- References.
Andrew J. Dick (deceased) was Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA. He taught research methods, juvenile delinquency, and social problems among other classes. He also conducted long-term research on the efficacy of peer courts as a tool for rehabilitation, as well as other sociological subjects.
William Rich is Professor Emeritus at California State University, Chico, USA, where he taught graduate courses in Educational Leadership and Curriculum in the School of Education. Additionally, he served as school district consultant in policy re-design based on participative inquiry processes that uncover local cultural biases and organizational barriers to success. He has held positions as private and public school teacher, public school administrator, and university professor.
Tony Waters is Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA, and beginning in 2016, Professor of Peace Studies at Payap University, Chiangmai, Thailand. He has taught Criminology, Social Theory, and Cultural Theory among other subjects. His past writing includes titles in classical social theory, violence, criminology, and refugees. He has published several books on these topics, including
Schooling, Childhood, and Bureaucracy (2012), and
Weber's Rationalism (2015) as well as
Crime and Immigrant Youth (1999), and
When Killing is a Crime (2007).
Über den Autor
Andrew J. Dick (deceased) was Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA. He taught research methods, juvenile delinquency, and social problems among other classes. He also conducted long-term research on the efficacy of peer courts as a tool for rehabilitation, as well as other sociological subjects.
William Rich is Professor Emeritus at California State University, Chico, USA, where he taught graduate courses in Educational Leadership and Curriculum in the School of Education. Additionally, he served as school district consultant in policy re-design based on participative inquiry processes that uncover local cultural biases and organizational barriers to success. He has held positions as private and public school teacher, public school administrator, and university professor.
Tony Waters is Professor of Sociology at California State University, Chico, USA, and beginning in 2016, Professor of Peace Studies at Payap University, Chiangmai, Thailand. He has taught Criminology, Social Theory, and Cultural Theory among other subjects. His past writing includes titles in classical social theory, violence, criminology, and refugees. He has published several books on these topics, including Schooling, Childhood, and Bureaucracy (2012), and Weber's Rationalism (2015) as well as Crime and Immigrant Youth (1999), and When Killing is a Crime (2007).
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Preface: A Study of Vocational Education in California Prisons.- List of Tables.- List of Figures.- SECTION I.- 1. Structure and Thesis of the Book.- 2. Applied Research in California's Prisons.- 3. Prison Logic Meets Educational Research Logic: The Undiscussables of Evidence-Based Decision Making.- SECTION II- The Report.- 4. Vignette: Could the Prisoner be My Son?.- 5. Report: Vocational Education in California Prisons: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Twelve Courses.-6. Literature Review.-7. Vignette: Sunglasses.-8. Vignette: Greenhouses.- 9. Report: Methods.- 10. Report: Results and Research Questions.- 11. Vignette: Shifting Bureaucratic Sands and Work Stoppages.- 12. Vignette: I'm All Good.- 13. Report: Discussion.- 14. Vignette: Educators Only Whisper in a Custody World.- 15. Recommendations and Conclusion.- 16. Vignette: Denial of Love and The Birds of Prison.- 17. Life Without Parole and "Could be Worse".- SECTION III.- 18. Evidence Based Decision Making and the Rise and Fall of Rehabilitation in California's Prisons 2005-2012.- References.
Klappentext
This book explores California's prison system in the context of vocational education reform. For prisons in the early twenty-first century, ideologies of evidence-based management meant that reform efforts to change the purpose of prisons from punishment to rehabilitation through vocational education required "evidence" to justify policy preillegalscriptions. Yet who determines what constitutes evidence? In political environments, solutions are typically pre-conceived, which means that the nature of the evidence collected is also preconceived. As a result, key assumptions about outcomes are often wished away to show improvement and be accountable. Through a detailed analysis interspersed with stories from the authors' experiences "behind the wall" among California's prison population, the authors challenge the nature of evidence-based research as used in the prison environment. In the process they describe the thorny problems facing reformers.
Presents well-researched findings based on qualitative and quantitative data on the Prison Vocational system in California
Offers a unique perspective on the politics of report writing
Provides readers with an in-depth, "behind the wall" look at the California Prison system